Senator Grassley Releases Medical Ghostwriting Report

By Chris at 1:45 pm on July 2, 2010Comments Off

The New York Times points out a new report released by Sen. Chuck Grassley on medical ghostwriting taking place in scholarly publishing. The NYT has reported on this specific topic previously but here’s a brief summary taken from Grassley’s report (full PDF from NYTimes):

Medical ghostwriting is a practice where pharmaceutical or device companies hire medical education, marketing or communications companies to draft articles that are presented to prominent physicians and scientists to sign on as authors to increase the likelihood that the article will be published in important medical journals. Ghostwritten articles include articles that are drafted by pharmaceutical or device company employees who are not acknowledged in the final publication…. The physicians and scientists agree to sign on even if they may not be intimately familiar with the underlying data or relevant research or provided limited input on the article. Authors who make little to no contribution to a publication are also referred to as “guest” authors. (page 2)

About two years ago, Senator Grassley inquired about an industry practice to get articles published in major medical journals touting the benefits of a company’s product without public disclosure that the company initiated and paid for the development of the articles. Specifically, Senator Grassley wrote to Merck & Co., Inc. (Merck) and Scientific Therapeutics Information (STI), a medical publishing company, following the publication of a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).  In that study the authors examined Merck’s manipulation of scientific literature through ghost writers to market the painkiller Vioxx. Notably, based on their review of court documents the authors of the JAMA article concluded that “review manuscripts were often prepared by unacknowledged authors and subsequently attributed authorship to academically affiliated investigators who often did not disclose industry financial support.” (page 1)

Similarly, in 2009, PLoS Medicine, an open-access peer-reviewed journal, made available court documents that detail how  pharmaceutical company Wyeth used ghostwriting to have positive messages about its product placed in scholarly journals.

Filed under: UncategorizedComments Off

Huge C-Span Video Archive

By Chris at 7:03 pm on March 17, 2010Comments Off

C-Span is about to launch a video archive that will include 160,000 hours of footage it has recorded since the 1980s.  A beta version is now available at http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/

Their site says that “Every event covered by the C-SPAN Networks since 1987″ will be available.

Users can keyword search for videos or browse through various categories such as date, topics, or specific programs (Book TV, Washington Journal, etc.)  Those interested in books and authors will find over 8,000 Book TV videos available now.  One nice feature C-Span has included is giving users the ability to create a custom start and endpoint for a video (a “clip”) and generate a hyperlink directly to it. With this you can link people to a specific segment of any video.

Filed under: UncategorizedComments Off

Popular Science Archive: Complete and Free

By Chris at 4:38 pm on March 7, 2010Comments Off

Popular Science magazine recently announced the availability of a free cover-to-cover archive of the magazine dating back to May 1872.  The archive is a result of a partnership with Google who also make the content available for browsing or searching on the Google Books site.

Filed under: UncategorizedComments Off

Ghostwriting policies at medical schools in the US

By Chris at 4:17 pm on February 2, 2010Comments Off

PLOS has a new article that examines the academic publishing policies on “authorship, ghostwriting, and conflicts of interest” currently in place at 50 medical schools in the US.  The 50 schools were selected based on their appearance in US News’ Best Medical Schools 2009 list.

Some of the results show that just over half of these top 50 schools do not have a published policy on authorship or ghostwriting and that only 13 of the 50 schools have policies in place that prohibit ghostwriting. The paper has an excellent reference list pointing to other research and writing on the topic of ghostwriting in medical journals.
If you don’t know much about ghostwriting, here’s a good starting point:

Ghostwriting: The Dirty Little Secret of Medical Publishing That Just Got Bigger

Filed under: UncategorizedComments Off

3 Sources for H1N1 Swine Flu Statistics and Charts

By Chris at 7:43 pm on October 9, 2009Comments Off

Looking for statistics, charts, or maps on H1N1 or seasonal influenza?  Here are three sources to get you started:

Centers for Disease Control: Flu Activity & Surveillance

http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/fluactivity.htm

Includes several charts and statistical tables including

  • weekly and cumulative data on the number of infected
  • a breakdown of types of influenza
  • number of hospitalizations and deaths
  • pediatric deaths and more

Also includes a map of the United States showing geographic spread and degree of reported flu activity (includes both seasonal and H1N1). Updated weekly.

http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/WeeklyFluActivityMap.htm

FluView

American College Health Association

The American College Health Association collects data on the number influenza-like illnesses reported on colleges and universities in the United States. Counts are submitted on a voluntarily basis by colleges and universities and are not to be considered inclusive of all institutions of higher education.

Their epicurve chart displays weekly data from late August through present and shows the number of new cases and the “attack rate” per 10,000 people.FluACHA

Google’s Flu Trends

Google’s Flu Trends map shows trends in flu search activity. Google reports that an increase in flu-related searches are “good indicators of flu activity.”  Activity is mapped geographically for the United States and can be compared to data from prior years.

FluGoog

Filed under: UncategorizedComments Off
Next Page »